There seems to be vested interests within the media to shutdown alternative ideas that dare threaten the neoliberal and socialist agenda.
In a bid to sway the Australian elections, disproportionate unfavourable reporting has been in full display for the Australian public to consume. This is without a doubt the situation that One Nation is facing. Considering their pro border defence stance and a promotion of traditional values, it comes as little shock that the left would be hellbent on sinking any chances of One Nation winning seats within the Senate.
One Nation was formed in 1997 by the current party leader Pauline Hanson after she became dis endorsed by the Liberal party as a federal candidate, due to remarks about her stance against race based welfare to a newspaper. This prompted her and likewise constituents to stand against the establishment which resulted in a very successful campaign in some states going as far as winning 11 of 89 seats in Queensland’s state parliament. Due to her controversial views amongst the establishment she has faced in many cases wide spread slander.
Only one month after Christchurch and the media is still just as quick to remind individuals of such a tragedy supposedly promulgated by the falsely labeled “Far Right”. In an proprietary attempt to cast One Nation as the sole creation of violence and social unrest through placing blame on the core tenants of the party for the events of Christchurch.
In another attempt to smear One Nation, following was the media release of footage revealing One Nations intent to receive funding from foreign pro fire arm pressure groups. It seems rather odd that all these tragic states of affairs reveal themselves to the Australian public weeks prior to an election that could shift the results from a Liberal National Coalition to the hands of Socialist wedge issue driven Labor. Despite footage from a year prior being withheld from the public domain until recently, there is every reason to question the intent of such reporting. Instead of focusing on the main component of the situation the reporting focused on the pressure groups intention of funding, rather than the illegal action of foreign funding in itself.
How ironic it is that the groups to report on the recent goings on just so happen to have an interest in seeing the current incarnation of Moralism brought about by the left come steps closer to fruition. It’s no coincidence and not a new strategy used by these lame stream firms.
This level of reporting isn’t from the kindness of the hearts from these media agencies. More so it’s all apart of opportunistic behaviour used to support the dystopian agenda that suits the lefts narrative, and calling out such blatant impropriety within journalism should be, however unfortunately is not the norm. This goes on a level much deeper than the events reported, more so the outcome of such reporting thereof. As a result, due to the current Coalition not preferencing One Nation you could see a shift in results at the election leading to a Labor government (as Australia uses preferential voting). The Coalition wouldn’t want to be associated with supposed “Far Right wingers” or “Nazis” as they could lose power in parliament.